My paper, “Two Solutions to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness” was just accepted for publication in American Philosophical Quarterly!
I think this means that I get to stop working for the day.
I’ll post a version of the paper soon. Here is the abstract.
Two Solutions to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness
Abstract
In this article, I provide two responses to J.L. Schellenberg’s version of the problem of divine hiddenness. In the first section I argue against Schellenberg’s assumption that personal relationships require belief. This undermines the motivation for one of the premises in Schellenberg’s argument. In the second section, I draw on some naturalistic intuitions about some really great goods that some naturalists argue are only possible in a Godless Universe. I argue that what is crucial for these goods is not a Godless Universe, but a Universe in which the existence of God is far from epistemically certain. This will yield a novel kind of greater good defense that gives us the resources to reject a different premise in Schellenberg’s argument.
I actually had to google the topic of this one. Reading this abstract was like reading one move in a really long game that I don’t play.
So do you end up arguing in favor of the existence of God, or a better argument for the non-existence of God, or are you just playing with words?
That’s great–congratulations. In fact, I may stop working for the day in your honor!
APQ‘s a good journal and often has some good phil of religion stuff. Kudos to you.
Thom,
The paper merely offers two responses to a very popular argument against God’s existence. So it’s not an argument for the existence of God, and it’s not me offering an argument against the existence of God.
I would definitely like to read this paper. There are so many awesome topics in philosophy of religion, and although I wouldn’t substitute this for anything we talked about in class, this would have been an awesome topic to discuss.
Congrats for the publication!
Congratulations! I’m really looking forward to reading it.