List

For those of you who have been following – the Senate has approved the new Telecom Immunity and New Eavesdropping Rules.

This looks like a prima facie violation of the fourth amendment. If anyone out there can explain to me why it’s not, I’d like to hear it.

3 Responses to “Telecom Immunity Bill Passes”

  1. Lewis Powell

    If I had to defend the constitutionality of it, I’d probably try and get some wiggle room out of the phrasing of the fourth.

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

    It seems like there is at least room for a strict constructionist to argue that information acquired by eavesdropping isn’t seized. Since the wiretapping in question is being done without the issuing of warrants, it seems like there is a loophole to avoid any worries from the second half of the amenedment.

    The weird thing is that one might be forced to concede a central point of that argument given a relatively popular stance on why filesharing isn’t the same as theft. It is effectively the same sort of breakdown in the attempt to use the physical property model when it comes to information.

    Presumably, though, just as the government shouldn’t be allowed to sidestep the 8th amendment by instituting cruel and unusual treatments for some reason other than punishment, they can’t avoid the fourth’s requirement to require justification for the issuance of a warrant by just skipping over the warrant issuing process entirely.

    In other words, I don’t buy the above argument, but it seems like a possible route to go for arguing the constitutionality of the law.

  2. Lara Kasper-Buckareff

    Good try, Lewis, but eavesdropping/wiretapping=seizure. See, e.g., Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). The ACLU and some other constitutional-loving folks have sued some constitutional-hating people, including Attorney General Mukasey, over the FISA Amendments Act (“FAA”) of 2008, asserting violations of the First and Fourth Amendments and separation of powers.

    I’m a civil and human rights attorney. I already suspect that my office and home phones are tapped (I’ve heard the clicking). With the FAA in place, at least now I KNOW that my phone conversations with my clients in other countries are monitored.

  3. Sam

    I don’t suppose the Bush Administration’s claims of, “Because, that’s why!” sway you?

    I think the key point is the “probable cause.” The Bush Administration and anybody else who supports this ludicrous bullshit claims that you won’t be spied on if you don’t have anything to hide. In their mind, the tap doesn’t get turned on unless there’s probable cause to do so. It’s a total lie, but that’s the thinking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  Posts

April 3rd, 2014

Ethics and Technology Panel This Week

I’m participated in a panel yesterday Fredonia on Ethics and Technology. The title of my presentation was “Grounding a Moral […]

March 27th, 2014

Gunshot victims to be suspended between life and death

This is unreal. Doctors in Pittsburgh will try to save the lives of 10 patients by placing them in a […]

March 26th, 2014

Diversity and Inclusiveness: Amy Ferrer over at newAPPS

The executive director of the American Philosophical Association is doing a series of guest posts this week over at newAPPS […]

March 20th, 2014

Thinking about moral realism may lead to better moral behavior.

This is really interesting. A recent article published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology suggests that being primed to think about […]

March 14th, 2014

APA Now Accepting Nominees for Leadership Positions

The APA now has an online nomination system. There are vacancies on all twenty APA committees. You can access the […]

February 27th, 2014

A Discovery Based Account of Intellectual Property Rights

One of the issues, that’s most interested me so far in the Ethics and Technology class I’m teaching is how […]

February 26th, 2014

How the MPAA inadvertently gave American Artists Leverage Against Hollywood

This is a very interesting read. For the most part it is an over-view of the global subsidy war between nations. Here’s […]

February 25th, 2014

Spritz – New Technology Aims to Boost Reading Speed to 500 words a minute

I just learned about Spritz today. It’s starts out to be pretty mind-blowing. The technology is designed to feed text […]

February 6th, 2014

Gettier Case in The Simpsons

If we assume that Bart (at some point) justifiably believed that the lemon-shaped rock was a lemon, then he had […]

February 4th, 2014

The Case of the Copyright Hoarder

I’m teaching an Ethics and Technology class this semester. I came up with a thought experiment today that I’m going […]