List

In Four Dimensionalism, Ted Sider briefly presents an argument against three-dimensionalism from the metaphysical possibility of time travel.

Time Travel Argument Against Three Dimensionalism

  1. If time travel is metaphysically possible and three dimensionalism is true, then it is metaphysically possible for a person to be wholly located in two different places at the same time.
  2. It is not metaphysically possible for a person to be wholly located in two different places at the same time.
  3. Therefore, it’s not true that time travel is metaphysically possible and three dimensionalism is true.
  4. Time travel is metaphysically possible.
  5. Therefore, three dimensionalism is not true.

One option for the three-dimensionalist is to reject (2). I don’t want to get into that (just yet). In this post, I simply want to note something odd about Sider’s response to another possible three dimensionalist reply.

The three dimensionalist could reject (4). In fact, they could reject (4), precisely because they recognize the same (apparent) incompatibility between three dimensionalism and the metaphysical possibility of time travel that Sider exploits.

Sider passes the buck to David Lewis’ Paradoxes of Time Travel defense of the metaphysical possibility of time travel. However, there is something dialectically odd about this move. Doesn’t Lewis explicitly assume four-dimensionalism in his defense?

I’ve got some more thoughts on the option to reject (2) – but I need to get back to grading.

UPDATE: Here’s the passage from the beginning of paradoxes of time travel that I had in mind.

The world – the time traveler’s world, or ours – is a four-dimensional manifold of events. Times is one dimension of the four…Enduring things are like timelike streaks: wholes composed of temporal parts, or stages, located at various times and places. Change is qualitative difference between different stages – different temporal parts – of some enduring things, just as a “change” in scenery from east to west is a qualitative difference between the eastern and western spatial parts of the landscape. If this paper should change your mind about the possibility of time travel, there will be a difference in opinion between two different temporal parts of you, the stage that started reading and the subsequent stage that finishes. (p.68-69)

3 Responses to “A Time Travel Argument Against Three Dimensionalism”

  1. Anonymous

    I am not sure I remember this paper correctly, but David Lewis might not assume Four-Dimensionalism. I know he introduces the notion of a ‘world line’ but, this notion might be consistent with 3Dism. In any case, I would have to look at the paper again to figure out whether or not he assumes 4Dism.

    Joshua

  2. Andrew Cullison

    Hey Joshua,

    I just went back and looked over the paper. Here’s the passage I was thinking of.

    The world – the time traveler’s world, or ours – is a four-dimensional manifold of events. Times is one dimension of the four…Enduring things are like timelike streaks: wholes composed of temporal parts, or stages, located at various times and places. Change is qualitative difference between different stages – different temporal parts – of some enduring things, just as a “change” in scenery from east to west is a qualitative difference between the eastern and western spatial parts of the landscape. If this paper should change your mind about the possibility of time travel, there will be a difference in opinion between two different temporal parts of you, the stage that started reading and the subsequent stage that finishes. (p.68-69)

  3. Anonymous

    Yes, Lewis is definitely assuming 4Dism here.

    I wonder whether Sider could say this. There are several paradoxes of time travel that Lewis addresses in his paper. Some of these merely bring forth central areas of dispute between the 3dist and the 4dist. The paradox being addressed on pages 68-69 is one such paradox. But, others are independent of the central areas of dispute between the 3Dist and the 4Dist. Moreover, Lewis has given plausible responses to these latter paradoxes. So, there is no reason to believe that time travel is impossible other than those reasons which are already playing a central part in the dispute between a 3Dist and a 4Dist. This, I think, is enough to get the disputants into a kind of stalemate over premise (4).

    Sider might add that Lewis helps his readers to robustly conceive of time travel and thus helps his readers to see that it is possible. This is less plausible, but if it is true, then it might edge the reader closer to affirming (4) than denying (4).

    Joshua

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  Posts

April 3rd, 2014

Ethics and Technology Panel This Week

I’m participated in a panel yesterday Fredonia on Ethics and Technology. The title of my presentation was “Grounding a Moral […]

March 27th, 2014

Gunshot victims to be suspended between life and death

This is unreal. Doctors in Pittsburgh will try to save the lives of 10 patients by placing them in a […]

March 26th, 2014

Diversity and Inclusiveness: Amy Ferrer over at newAPPS

The executive director of the American Philosophical Association is doing a series of guest posts this week over at newAPPS […]

March 20th, 2014

Thinking about moral realism may lead to better moral behavior.

This is really interesting. A recent article published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology suggests that being primed to think about […]

March 14th, 2014

APA Now Accepting Nominees for Leadership Positions

The APA now has an online nomination system. There are vacancies on all twenty APA committees. You can access the […]

February 27th, 2014

A Discovery Based Account of Intellectual Property Rights

One of the issues, that’s most interested me so far in the Ethics and Technology class I’m teaching is how […]

February 26th, 2014

How the MPAA inadvertently gave American Artists Leverage Against Hollywood

This is a very interesting read. For the most part it is an over-view of the global subsidy war between nations. Here’s […]

February 25th, 2014

Spritz – New Technology Aims to Boost Reading Speed to 500 words a minute

I just learned about Spritz today. It’s starts out to be pretty mind-blowing. The technology is designed to feed text […]

February 6th, 2014

Gettier Case in The Simpsons

If we assume that Bart (at some point) justifiably believed that the lemon-shaped rock was a lemon, then he had […]

February 4th, 2014

The Case of the Copyright Hoarder

I’m teaching an Ethics and Technology class this semester. I came up with a thought experiment today that I’m going […]